Would PAS agree to the establishment of an IBC instead of further racializing our electoral system?

I refer to the statement by PAS’ central committee member, Mohd Khairuddin Aman Razali, with regards to the re-delineation of electoral boundaries.

He has stated that the three Malay-based parties – UMNO, Bersatu, and PAS – have to work together to gain a two-thirds majority in the next general election. This will then enable them to amend the constitution and increase the number of electoral seats in Malay-majority states.

I am surprised that Mohd Khairuddin, as a senior politician and Minister, would make such a claim. His proposal is misguided for several reasons.

First, the primary purpose of re-delineating electoral boundaries is to adjust for demographic changes over time. The Federal Constitution sets out clear principles for re-delineation, i.e. to ensure the equality of voting power among voters (one person, one vote) and to maintain local ties among the community.

These two principles should be the underlying consideration in any re-delineation process, not race and religion.

Second, any proposal to increase the number of electoral seats should consider inter-state malapportionment and the ability of elected representatives to effectively represent their voters.

I presume that Mohd Khairuddin’s proposal to increase seats in Malay-majority states is directed towards Terengganu, Kelantan, and Kedah where PAS has a strong presence.

Indeed, these states are presently under-represented at the federal level. However, they are not the only states suffering from this. The top five under-represented states are Selangor, Terengganu, Melaka, Kuala Lumpur, and Kedah[1].

This shows that the problem of inter-state malapportionment goes beyond race and religion. Therefore, Mohd Khairuddin’s suggestion to arbitrarily increase electoral seats based on race is baseless. It would instead further racialise our electoral system and divide our society.

Third, Mohd Khairuddin ought to realise that, under the Federal Constitution, the re-delineation process is conducted by the Electoral Commission (EC). The EC is an independent constitutional body. It has to carry out its duties without favouring any political parties.

No government, including Mohd Khairuddin’s imaginary two-thirds government, should interfere in the re-delineation process by the EC.

The DAP calls for the establishment of an Independent Boundaries Commission (IBC) so that future re-delineation exercises can be conducted independently and fairly. The IBC would be a separate body from the EC and the executive. It shall have the final authority to review and pass the electoral boundaries without any interference from political parties or the Prime Minister.

The proposal to establish an IBC is consistent with the recommendation by civil society and the Electoral Reform Committee (ERC).

I have previously issued a statement to ask Azmin Ali, as the head of the special cabinet committee for electoral reform, to clarify if the current Perikatan Nasional (PN) government agrees to this recommendation. Neither Azmin Ali nor the government has responded to the question.

Instead of further racializing our electoral system, Mohd Khairuddin, as a Minister and senior leader of PAS, should state if he would support the establishment of an IBC so that further re-delineation can be conducted independently and fairly.

Khoo Poay Tiong
MP Kota Melaka

—-
[1] The value of votes in these states compared to the Malaysian average in the 2018 General Election are: Selangor 0.65, Terengganu, 0.73, Melaka 0.80, Kuala Lumpur 0.85, and Kedah 0.88.

 

Would PAS agree to the establishment of an IBC instead of further racializing our electoral system?

I refer to the statement by PAS’ central committee member, Mohd Khairuddin Aman Razali, with regards to the re-delineation of electoral boundaries.

He has stated that the three Malay-based parties – UMNO, Bersatu, and PAS – have to work together to gain a two-thirds majority in the next general election. This will then enable them to amend the constitution and increase the number of electoral seats in Malay-majority states.

I am surprised that Mohd Khairuddin, as a senior politician and Minister, would make such a claim. His proposal is misguided for several reasons.

First, the primary purpose of re-delineating electoral boundaries is to adjust for demographic changes over time. The Federal Constitution sets out clear principles for re-delineation, i.e. to ensure the equality of voting power among voters (one person, one vote) and to maintain local ties among the community.

These two principles should be the underlying consideration in any re-delineation process, not race and religion.

Second, any proposal to increase the number of electoral seats should consider inter-state malapportionment and the ability of elected representatives to effectively represent their voters.

I presume that Mohd Khairuddin’s proposal to increase seats in Malay-majority states is directed towards Terengganu, Kelantan, and Kedah where PAS has a strong presence.

Indeed, these states are presently under-represented at the federal level. However, they are not the only states suffering from this. The top five under-represented states are Selangor, Terengganu, Melaka, Kuala Lumpur, and Kedah[1].

This shows that the problem of inter-state malapportionment goes beyond race and religion. Therefore, Mohd Khairuddin’s suggestion to arbitrarily increase electoral seats based on race is baseless. It would instead further racialise our electoral system and divide our society.

Third, Mohd Khairuddin ought to realise that, under the Federal Constitution, the re-delineation process is conducted by the Electoral Commission (EC). The EC is an independent constitutional body. It has to carry out its duties without favouring any political parties.

No government, including Mohd Khairuddin’s imaginary two-thirds government, should interfere in the re-delineation process by the EC.

The DAP calls for the establishment of an Independent Boundaries Commission (IBC) so that future re-delineation exercises can be conducted independently and fairly. The IBC would be a separate body from the EC and the executive. It shall have the final authority to review and pass the electoral boundaries without any interference from political parties or the Prime Minister.

The proposal to establish an IBC is consistent with the recommendation by civil society and the Electoral Reform Committee (ERC).

I have previously issued a statement to ask Azmin Ali, as the head of the special cabinet committee for electoral reform, to clarify if the current Perikatan Nasional (PN) government agrees to this recommendation. Neither Azmin Ali nor the government has responded to the question.

Instead of further racializing our electoral system, Mohd Khairuddin, as a Minister and senior leader of PAS, should state if he would support the establishment of an IBC so that further re-delineation can be conducted independently and fairly.

Khoo Poay Tiong
MP Kota Melaka

—-
[1] The value of votes in these states compared to the Malaysian average in the 2018 General Election are: Selangor 0.65, Terengganu, 0.73, Melaka 0.80, Kuala Lumpur 0.85, and Kedah 0.88.

 

伊斯兰党是否同意成立独立选区划分委员会,而不是进一步地种族隔离马来西亚的选举制度?

伊斯兰党是否同意成立独立选区划分委员会(IBC),而不是进一步地种族隔离马来西亚的选举制度?

我针对的是伊斯兰党中委凯鲁丁关于重新划分选区的声明。

他表示,3个马来政党-巫统、土团党以及伊斯兰党必须合作,在下届大选取得三分之二的多数优势。然后,这将让他们能够修宪,并增加马来选民占大多数的议席席位。

我对凯鲁丁相关言论感到震惊,因为身为一名资深政治人物及部长竟然会提出这样的要求,而他的建议具有以下几个的误导因素。

首先,选区划分的目的是为了适应选区上的地理以及人口变化。《联邦宪法》阐明了选区划分的明确原则,即确保选民的投票权平等(一人一票),并维护社区之间的联系。

这2个原则是重新划分选区的因素,而不是为了宗族和宗教信仰。

第二,任何新增议席的提议都应该考量州际分配不当以及民选代表是否有效地代表选民的权力。

我猜想,凯鲁丁提出增加马来选民占大多数的议席州属应该是针对伊斯兰党老树盘根的登嘉楼、吉兰丹以及吉打州。

实际上,这些州属在联邦级别的代表人数虽不足,但是仍不至于是最严重的州属,目前代表不足的前5个州属分别是雪兰莪、登嘉楼、马六甲、吉隆坡和吉打。

这也说明了州际的失衡问题已经超出了种族和宗教范围,因此凯鲁丁发表根据以种族来增加选举席位的建议是不可行。相反,它将会进一步使到我国的选举制度种族化,并分裂这个多元种族、宗教的社会。

第三,凯鲁丁应该知道,根据联邦宪法,选区划分工作是由选举委员会(SPR)所进行,它是一个独立的宪法机构,必须在不偏帮任何政党的情况下履行职务。

任何人,包括凯鲁丁在内的任何政府人员都不应该干预选举委员会的选区划分工作。

行动党呼吁政府能够成立一个独立选区划分委员会(IBC),以确保未来的选区划分工作能够独立及公正地举行。这个委员会将不附属于选委会以及行政部门的架构,它有最终权力来审查及批准选区划分的建议,而不受到任何政党或者首相的干预。

成立独立选区划分委员会的建议也是和民间社会以及选举改革委员会的建议是一致的。

我曾经发表一项声明,促请选举改革特别内阁委员会负责人阿兹敏阿里对外说明,国盟是否同意这项建议?但阿兹敏以及政府都没有回复这项生命。

身为伊斯兰党部长和领导人的凯鲁丁不应该进一步把我国的选举制度种族隔离化,他也应该说明本身是否建议成立独立选区划分委员会,以便可以独立及公正地进一步进行选区划分的工作。

 

邱培栋
马六甲市区国会议员